NEW 2015 Yamaha YZF-R125 vs Honda CBR125R


WHAT would you guess were the UK's two top-selling supersports bikes? Kawasaki's ZX-6R and Honda's CBR600RR perhaps?

According to industry figures, which include litre superbikes, 125s and all other capacities, it's the Honda CBR125R and Yamaha YZF-R125.

And despite being £850 more expensive, the Yamaha is giving the Honda a convincing pummeling, with 1,419 YZF-R125s registered between January and October this year compared 782 CBR125Rs.

But they're exactly the same capacity, almost exactly the same weight and make about the same power - so can the Yamaha justify the extra expense? Or have 637 people got it wrong this year? Don't decide before reading this.  


Reasons to buy Yamaha YZF-R125                 


  • You won’t find a better-looking 125.
 But that’s obvious. You’ve got eyes.


  • It doesn’t just look like a proper sports bike.
 It stops and handles like one too.



  • It’s right on the power limit for learners
 and A1 licence holders, at 15hp.



  • If you’ve a mind to, you can tune them for
 more power (after gaining the appropriate licence, naturally)
. There’s a Malossi 182cc big-bore kit.



  • Every 17-year-old wants a better bike
 than their mates' and this is basically the daddy. 
If price were no object, which would you have?

Price: £4,349 OTR
Capacity: 124.7cc
Power: 15hp
Wet weight: 138kg 
Seat height: 818mm


Reasons to buy CBR125R


  • It’s £850 cheaper than the Yamaha.
 That’s nearly a whole of your thousand pounds. 


  • It’s more learner-friendly,

 with a lower seat-height than the Yamaha and a useful steering lock.



  • It’s great fun to throw around, 

with sharp handling, good brakes and suspension.



  • It makes the most of its 13.1hp,

 with super-linear power delivery.



  • It’s sharper looking since a 2007 restyling.

 Earlier models looked a bit weedy

Price: £3,499 OTR
Capacity: 124.7cc
Power: 13.1hp
Wet weight: 136.9kg 
Seat height: 793mm

Our choice: YZF-R125

Save your money and buy a bigger bike after getting a full licence blah blah blah. We don’t go for that old argument. With all new riders aged 17-19 now restricted to a 125, we think many will simply want the best one they can get, and why shouldn’t they?

The R125 is pricey. It’s also one of the sharpest looking and handling 125s you can get. Possibly not as novice-friendly as the CBR, with a higher seat and lower bars, but you’ve got two mandated years with it – how much of a novice will you be by the end of that?

The CBR’s a lot of fun and might have won if it made the full 15hp permissible under licence terms. Surely the law is restrictive enough without Honda holding back more?
yamaha vs honda



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Yamaha R1 unveiled at Eicma

Image
THIS is Yamaha's 2015 R1, with more power, less weight and a sophisticated new electronics package. The new version of the flagship sports bike makes a claimed 200hp and weighs 199kg wet, 18hp more and 7kg less than the current model. It gives the new R1 a power-to-weight ratio of more than 1hp/kg and one of the best available in any bike on the market. It's got a new crossplane engine with titanium fracture-split conrods, a 10.5-litre airbox, two-directional fuel injectors and a titanium exhaust. Highlights of the new eletronics package include banking-sensitive traction control and ABS, launch and lift control, power modes and a quick-shifter. A modified chassis features an asymetrical aluminium deltabox for compact dimensions and a short wheel-base. It's got a magnesium sub-frame, aluminium tank and cast magnesium wheels. The fairing design is influenced by Yamaha's M1 MotoGP bike with a central ram air take, according to the firm. Yamaha also unveiled a...
Read more

Trump will survive but Pam Bondi may be toast for donation scandal

Image
  Last week, Pam Bondi tried to make her three-year-long run of bad press come to an end. It did not. That's partly because, when Florida's attorney general finally had a press conference to explain why she took $25,000 in campaign cash from someone she had been asked to investigate, her excuses sounded incredibly lame. And unbelievable. She asked people to believe that, when a committee supporting her campaign took $25,000 from Donald Trump on Sept. 17, 2013, she had no idea that her office had been asked to investigate him. Pam Bondi plays defense Bondi defends against quid pro quo accusations, state Legislature looking at $1.3 billion budget shortfall, Gary Johnson unsure of Aleppo Even though a week earlier, her spokeswoman had told media that Bondi's office was "reviewing" complaints against Trump. And even though, two weeks before that, email records show that Bondi's top staffers – at least nine of them, including her chief of staff and deputy attor...
Read more